Post Conviction Results

Parents declared actually innocent of injury to a child after new medical evidence

Summary

A husband and wife had each pleaded guilty to injury to a child and been placed on deferred adjudication. After their child was diagnosed with a brain injury and possible cerebral palsy, we filed Article 11.072 writs arguing actual innocence based on the new medical evidence. The State agreed, the trial court declared both parents actually innocent, and the charges were dismissed and set for expunction.

Case at a glance

FieldDetail
Original pleaInjury to a child: one parent, state jail felony; the other, first-degree felony
Sentence3 years’ and 5 years’ deferred adjudication
County / court[confirm]
Legal issueActual innocence based on new medical evidence; pleas made without a full medical evaluation
RemedyTwo Article 11.072 writs of habeas corpus (for people on community supervision
OutcomeBoth declared actually innocent; convictions vacated; charges dismissed; expunctions to follow
Decided[confirm] (writs filed in 2024; result posted February 2025)
Court opinionNone; Article 11.072 writs are decided by the trial court

The story

Both parents pleaded guilty to resolve the case and avoid a long trial. At the time, no one had fully examined what caused their child’s injury.

After the pleas, the child was diagnosed with a brain injury, and the pediatrician raised the possibility of cerebral palsy. No doctor could say whether the injury predated, contributed to, or caused what had been reported as abuse. The pleas had been entered without that medical picture.

The strategy and timeline

Because both parents were still on deferred adjudication, the right tool was an Article 11.072 writ, which challenges a case while someone is on community supervision. We filed one for each parent.

Guilty pleas

Each parent was placed on deferred adjudication (3 years and 5 years).

New diagnosis

Medical records showed a brain injury and possible cerebral palsy.

Writs filed

We presented the medical reports and argued that, given this uncertainty, no reasonable jury would convict. That is the “clear and convincing evidence” standard for actual innocence.

State’s response

The State agreed with our position.

Ruling

The trial court declared both parents actually innocent, vacated the convictions, and dismissed the charges. Expunctions are underway.

If you’re in a similar situation

A guilty plea does not always end the case. If medical or scientific evidence emerges later that undercuts the State’s theory, an actual innocence claim may still be possible.

An 11.072 writ applies to people currently on probation or deferred adjudication. An 11.07 writ applies to felony convictions after a final sentence. Relief depends on how strong and how new the evidence is.

Verification

No appellate opinion exists, because the trial court decided these writs.

Disclaimer

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every case depends on its own facts and law. This page describes a past matter handled by Blizzard & Zimmerman Attorneys and is not legal advice.